The House settlement has set the stage for revenue-sharing between universities and their athletes. Here's a look at what the settlement means moving forward.

The term has emerged as the most important part of the long-awaited legal settlement that will greatly reshape college sports, following its approval late last week. This is that House v. NCAA thing that’d been drip-dripping in the news forever, the Colleges Can Now Pay Their Athletes Actual Money thing.

The fund for past athletes will likely result in reduced NCAA payouts for member schools which Purdue estimates to be around a loss of $1.2 million per year for 10 years. Other than that, they want you to give more money. It’s really that simple.

A federal judge has approved terms of a sprawling $2.8 billion antitrust settlement that will upend the way college sports have been run for more than a century.

As the future of college athletics goes through a dramatic change, the University of Colorado is prepared to go all-in.

Conference commissioners lauded a judge’s approval of a $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit settlement as a means for bringing stability and fairness to an out-of-control college athletics industry.

The specter of private equity money has loomed as a possibility for funding college athletics programs for a while now. Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark floated the possibility of private equity entering the college sports world last summer and he was only one of multiple conference commissioners to do.