The original vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention test was run at 12 and 25 mph (20 and 40 kph) with a passenger car target in the center of the travel lane. It was discontinued at the end of ...

Last year, only one vehicle tested won a "good" rating in emergency braking study. A new study rated 22 of 30 "good" or ...

Two neighbors face contrasting fortunes in rebuilding after a wildfire, highlighting California's growing home insurance crisis.

High-visibility or reflective clothing may be invisible to automated crash prevention systems, according to a study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tested the forward collision warnings and automatic braking capabilities of 30 ...

Researchers said analysis of two-vehicle crash data shows extra-heavy vehicles don't make occupants any safer, but they are a ...

Past a certain point (about 4,000 pounds), the weight of a vehicle does little to pad safety in a crash. Instead, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) says all the additional mass ...

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) finally appears to be looking into how vehicle sizing impacts crash safety.

For example, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Colorado doesn't require AVs to have liability insurance. California does. AV companies argue that these inconsistent rules ...

Until it doesn’t, especially with regard to how those in the other vehicle fare, according to a just-released report from the industry-supported Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Even the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) says so. There are many caveats. Massive vehicles are much, much more dangerous for pedestrians, bicyclists, and any other living or ...