Justice Sam Alito asked a lawyer representing PornHub if the site boasted essays "by the modern day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?" The post Justice Alito Asks PornHub’s Lawyer If People Visit the Site for the Articles ‘Like the Old Playboy Magazine’ first appeared on Mediaite.
While considering a First Amendment case about access to explicit websites online, Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito appeared to be unfamiliar with websites such as PornHub, asking representing attorneys about the kinds of content available on such websites.
Supreme Court justices sometimes have a say over the fate of administration policies. Read more at straitstimes.com.
The justice spoke to President-elect Donald Trump on the phone hours before Trump asked the Supreme Court to stop his sentencing.
You have essays there by the modern-day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?” the jurist asked to laughter from spectators.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh wrote that they would have granted his request. The justices will return to the bench this morning for oral arguments in TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, the dispute over a law that would ...
Most Supreme Court justices seemed skeptical that free speech online is “imperiled” by a Texas law requiring porn websites to verify ages.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh brought up past examples of the U.S. blocking broadcasting companies from having ties to foreign governments and brought up the government’s concerns about TikTok collecting data on U.S. users, which he said “seems like a huge concern for the future of the country.”
WASHINGTON >> The U.S. Supreme Court upheld today a law banning TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its Chinese parent company ByteDance does not sell the short-video app by Sunday,
The adult entertainment industry asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a Texas law requiring porn sites to verify user ages Wednesday, and the justices wanted to know more about the sites' offerings.
Donald Trump was sentenced Friday morning in New York for a criminal fraud conviction decided last May despite months of legal maneuvers aimed at forestalling the hearing and an unsuccessful, last-minute request to the Supreme Court to intervene.
The high court was highly skeptical that the difference between false and misleading would overturn a Chicago man’s conviction, but some of the justices seemed open to allowing the opportunity.